Connect with us


Sidney Crosby’s Injury Has The Takes Reaching A Boiling Point

After trying their very best to lose a game in which they held a 2-0 lead with under two minutes left, the Caps allowed us to hang onto the tiniest sliver of optimism by winning Game 3 early in overtime. Certainly, our souls will still be crushed later in the series, but for now, there’s hope.

Of course, that’s not the big takeaway from Monday night. The injury to Sidney Crosby is the talking point du jour, and the takes are coming in hot and heavy.

The most absurd of which comes from this guy:

This is Rob Rossi, who I’m not convinced isn’t Darren Rovell’s brother. He used to write for the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review and now pens opinions like this for something called

Makes you wonder what that closed-door meeting called by Capitals players was really about after their blowout defeat in Game 2, huh?

Not really.

If they say it wasn’t about eliminating Crosby, the Capitals are liars. And if that sounds like an unfair accusation to make of the Capitals, then please consider my decade of experience covering a sport I love and a league I really, really, really want to give the benefit of the doubt.

(Or maybe consider their coach publicly saying his players must go places they hadn’t gone before?)

Sorry, but I cannot give the Capitals, or the NHL, any benefit. And I doubt very much there wasn’t an intent to injure Crosby when this series shifted to Pittsburgh.

The plan to injure Crosby, which was devised in a closed-door meeting, worked to perfection: Give him a scoring chance, then have Ovi make just enough legal contact to cause Crosby to lose his balance so he falls directly into the waiting cross-check of Niskanen. And it looks like they’re totally going to get away with it — Nisky won’t be suspended.

But this wasn’t the only take coming from Pittsburgh suggesting the play was possibly intentional. Kevin Gorman of offered this:

Maybe you’d be more willing to buy [Niskanen’s] explanation if it wasn’t from the Capitals, the same organization against which Crosby suffered a concussion on a blindside hit by David Steckel in the 2011 Winter Classic, an injury that caused him to miss 63 games over two seasons.

So the evidence being used here to suggest intent on Niskanen’s part is that a guy who hasn’t played for the Capitals since that 2010-11 season hurt Crosby six years ago. There’s your smoking gun, folks.

There are still at least two games left in this series. Let’s hope everyone continues to remain calm and rational.

Former Managing Editor at UPROXX; former Senior Editor at @SBNation; former ska-zine editor, fan of bad sports teams and good beer.



  1. John

    May 2, 2017 at 12:32 PM

    Sorry. I have to say that the writer is biased and hasn’t obviously played at a competitive level. Was there a missed penalty on ovechkin sure. Is there missed calls against Crosby every game sure. When a man is falling down he loses control. If your about to be run into how many people naturally allow that to occur. No one. When you fall down do you not put your hands in front to brace the impact. Of course you do. To see this as anything other is silly. The writers need to get out of their bubble.

    • Apt_pupil15

      May 3, 2017 at 12:45 AM

      One could argue there were three uncalled penalties on Ovie during that 1 play. Slash, high stick, and a trip/slew foot. The latter being the most egregious imho.

      I do not believe musky intended to slay Crosby but I have little doubt he knew what he was doing. He stated as much in his post game interview stating he was gonna cross check him.

      All that said, glad the Pens still have the very best player on the ice in game 4. Hemp usually steps up when Crosby is out. Expecting the same moving forward.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More in Capitals