<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Redskins Cover the Spread, But Not T.O.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://misterirrelevant.com/index.php/2007/11/18/redskins-cover-the-spread-but-not-to/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://misterirrelevant.com/index.php/2007/11/18/redskins-cover-the-spread-but-not-to/#utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=redskins-cover-the-spread-but-not-to</link>
	<description>Mr. Irrelevant is a D.C. sports blog covering the Redskins, Nationals, Orioles, Wizards, Capitals, Terrapins and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:35:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: StuScottsLazyEye</title>
		<link>http://misterirrelevant.com/index.php/2007/11/18/redskins-cover-the-spread-but-not-to/comment-page-1/#comment-1716</link>
		<dc:creator>StuScottsLazyEye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 21:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://misterirrelevant.com/index.php/2007/11/18/redskins-cover-the-spread-but-not-to/#comment-1716</guid>
		<description>where is dexter manley when you need a good ol qb cheap shot. he could have taken out brady and romo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where is dexter manley when you need a good ol qb cheap shot. he could have taken out brady and romo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ScottVanPeltStyle</title>
		<link>http://misterirrelevant.com/index.php/2007/11/18/redskins-cover-the-spread-but-not-to/comment-page-1/#comment-1707</link>
		<dc:creator>ScottVanPeltStyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://misterirrelevant.com/index.php/2007/11/18/redskins-cover-the-spread-but-not-to/#comment-1707</guid>
		<description>I would say Romo is more Charming than Charmed, but hey, poTAYto, poTAHto.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say Romo is more Charming than Charmed, but hey, poTAYto, poTAHto.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theinnkeeper</title>
		<link>http://misterirrelevant.com/index.php/2007/11/18/redskins-cover-the-spread-but-not-to/comment-page-1/#comment-1702</link>
		<dc:creator>theinnkeeper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 03:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://misterirrelevant.com/index.php/2007/11/18/redskins-cover-the-spread-but-not-to/#comment-1702</guid>
		<description>Two thoughts:

1. I agree about Gibbs and that 4th &amp; 1. What&#039;s he thinking? You&#039;ll give up field position if you fail on either option, but you have to prefer the odds on a 1 yard run, right?

2. Eli actually looked like an actual Manning today. An inferior Manning, but a Manning nonetheless. He still looked like he pooped in his pants but, you know, he looked like he was happy about it. Peyton looks a lot more like Eli BTW without Marvin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two thoughts:</p>
<p>1. I agree about Gibbs and that 4th &amp; 1. What&#8217;s he thinking? You&#8217;ll give up field position if you fail on either option, but you have to prefer the odds on a 1 yard run, right?</p>
<p>2. Eli actually looked like an actual Manning today. An inferior Manning, but a Manning nonetheless. He still looked like he pooped in his pants but, you know, he looked like he was happy about it. Peyton looks a lot more like Eli BTW without Marvin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StuScottsLazyEye</title>
		<link>http://misterirrelevant.com/index.php/2007/11/18/redskins-cover-the-spread-but-not-to/comment-page-1/#comment-1701</link>
		<dc:creator>StuScottsLazyEye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 02:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://misterirrelevant.com/index.php/2007/11/18/redskins-cover-the-spread-but-not-to/#comment-1701</guid>
		<description>Has anyone noticed that the Redskins are 0-4 when Aikman and Buck broadcast the games? Giants, Packers, Pats, and now the Cowboys.  Can we get Gibbs to make a call into Mr &quot;GOD&quot;dell&#039;s offices about this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone noticed that the Redskins are 0-4 when Aikman and Buck broadcast the games? Giants, Packers, Pats, and now the Cowboys.  Can we get Gibbs to make a call into Mr &#8220;GOD&#8221;dell&#8217;s offices about this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Shepherd</title>
		<link>http://misterirrelevant.com/index.php/2007/11/18/redskins-cover-the-spread-but-not-to/comment-page-1/#comment-1699</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Shepherd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 01:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://misterirrelevant.com/index.php/2007/11/18/redskins-cover-the-spread-but-not-to/#comment-1699</guid>
		<description>It was a good game. I feel better about this loss than I do about the win against the Cardinals. We almost looked like a football team out there (except  for Reed Doughty). I think this is the first time I&#039;ve seen the Redskins pull off a 2-minute drill in about 5 years. 

The good news is, if we&#039;re still in contention for a wildcard spot by the Dallas home game, the Cowboys will probably be resting their starters ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a good game. I feel better about this loss than I do about the win against the Cardinals. We almost looked like a football team out there (except  for Reed Doughty). I think this is the first time I&#8217;ve seen the Redskins pull off a 2-minute drill in about 5 years. </p>
<p>The good news is, if we&#8217;re still in contention for a wildcard spot by the Dallas home game, the Cowboys will probably be resting their starters &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Mottram</title>
		<link>http://misterirrelevant.com/index.php/2007/11/18/redskins-cover-the-spread-but-not-to/comment-page-1/#comment-1698</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Mottram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 01:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://misterirrelevant.com/index.php/2007/11/18/redskins-cover-the-spread-but-not-to/#comment-1698</guid>
		<description>I guess having half your secondary injured makes a minor difference. Skins sans Taylor was much like Oregon sans Dixon: You really don&#039;t understand the impact til they aren&#039;t there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess having half your secondary injured makes a minor difference. Skins sans Taylor was much like Oregon sans Dixon: You really don&#8217;t understand the impact til they aren&#8217;t there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

